delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <A125B3D81974D311BDE60008C7E6EEF204A58BAA@zuk28exm03.ecid.cig.mot.com> |
From: | Hathaway Nigel-NHATHAW1 <NHATHAW1 AT motorola DOT com> |
To: | "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Binutils man pages - y2k problem |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:31:06 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) |
The dates in the man pages for many the binutils is stated as 24/Apr/101 or 23/Mar/101, etc. Not all of them are like this, and I suspect that there may be other packages with this problem. I don't know what has been used to generate the pages, so I couldn't point to the source of the bug. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |