Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<E97DAEEFD08EA744B0624B6DD315E6A7031BB1B1@ex-600town-01.macromedia.com>
From:	Deneb Meketa <dmeketa AT macromedia DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Does -mno-cygwin sometimes have no effect?
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:56:37 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

It seems to me that when I use the -mno-cygwin option to gcc,
this has the intended effect (no dependency on cygwin1.dll)
most of the time, but in situations where certain additional
cygwin libs are needed (in my case, cygintl.dll), -mno-cygwin
doesn't do anything; the output exe always requires cygwin
libs.

Is this correct?  This would make sense if there is no Windows
equivalent to something like cygintl.dll.  However, if this is
in fact the case, I would love a warning from gcc indicating
that honoring -mno-cygwin will not be possible.

Many thanks
d.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -