delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 08:01:13AM -0700, Tak Ota wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:19:06 +0200, Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote: > > > Since you only fork() but never wait(), your children processes > > become zombies. The zombie list per process is fixed to ... 64 entries. > > Then why doesn't fork() start returning -1 when the number of zombie > reaches maximum count? And why does sleep get affected by this? Since that's the flaw in Cygwin I mentioned. The effect to sleep() was basically due to writing over an array boundary which has reproducably hit another signal related variable. Unfortunately you'll have to wait for 1.3.3 or take a developers snapshot to get the fixed behaviour. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |