delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Corinna, > > The question remains, shouldn't the response from the access() call > indicate that the named file is not readble (or accessible in any way), > since in fact it is not? You're right. I'm using the latest developers snapshot and the result is /home/corinna[103]$ ./y aaaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbccccccccccddddddddddeeeeeeeeeeffffffffffgggggggggghhhhhhhhhh iiiiiiiiiijjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkllllllllllmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooppppppppp pqqqqqqqqqqrrrrrrrrrrssssssssssttttttttttuuuuuuuuuuvvvvvvvvvvwwwwwwwwwwxxxxxxxxx xyyyyyyyyyyzzzzzzzzzz01234567890:/ is NOT readable So the problem is solved in the next Cygwin version. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |