Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:25:13 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	Mo DeJong <mdejong AT cygnus DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problem choosing exe entry point.
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SOL.3.91.1010705215806.2695B-100000@cse.cygnus.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010706002321.27159D-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Mo DeJong wrote:

> I think I have found a problem with the way Cygwin ld
> picks the executable entry point when both WinMain() and main()
> are available. I would think that passing in the -mwindows flag
> (which gets passed to ld as --subsystem windows) would clear
> things up and link with WinMain(). Instead, Cygwin ld is
> choosing main().

I would consider this a quality of implementation issue rather
than a bug. Having both main and WinMain is rather ambiguous
under most circumstances, and I'm not sure I'd qualify this as
a bug.

Mo, do you have any reason to have both, or do you have a project
that defines both?

Regards,
Mumit



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -