Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:11:37 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: I can't find command su.exe
Message-ID:	<20010705181137.A28285@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<50A89B19AEAAD411B9D200A0C9FB5699E88D85 AT craius DOT cportcorp DOT com> <3B44DE76 DOT 7000505 AT Interwoven DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3B44DE76.7000505@Interwoven.com>; from sandman@Interwoven.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:39:02PM -0700

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Sandeep Tamhankar wrote:
>Hmm, I'm beginning to think my 1.3.2 didn't come with su after all.  I 
>was upgrading from 1.1.8 when I got 1.3.2.  When I do su --version, it 
>tells me "GNU sh-utils 1.16"...and the sh-utils package that came with 
>1.3.2 is v2.0-2...and doesn't contain an su executable.  Maybe it came 
>with b20 and I just held onto it when I upgraded from b20 to 1.1.8.
>
>Anyway, the other message about the e-mail archive message that 
>elaborates on "it works not as you expect it to do" basically says use 
>"login" instead of su.

Cygwin does not currently support su.  If you have a version of su in
your /bin directory, it came from an older version of sh-utils.  Newer
versions do not include it.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -