| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Message-Id: | <200107012101.RAA20522@delorie.com> |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 22:5:4 +0000 |
| From: | Will Sheppard <will AT siteaboutnothing DOT com> |
| Reply-To: | will AT siteaboutnothing DOT com |
| To: | "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | Documentation for Windows users |
| X-mailer: | FoxMail 2.1 [en] |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Why doesn't the Cygwin installation put a readme file in its root directory, directing users to the documentation on the website? Or even better - actually install the documentation in a format easily acessible to people who have only used Windows their whole lives. This seems to be a problem affecting most ports of software to Windows - the binaries are there, but not usable by people with no knowledge of Unix systems. Also, would it really be that difficult to include a GUI to some of these programs, such as the C compiler? It really would make them so much easier to use for Windows users. Surely the ultimate OS would combine the power and stability of Unix with the user-interface of Windows... Or am I totally missing the point here? - Will Sheppard -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |