delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <001301c1022e$5bbb0960$c6823bd5@dima> |
From: | "Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry AT baikal DOT ru> |
To: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <20010628221547 DOT A3873 AT redhat DOT com> <20010629174426 DOT C9027 AT redhat DOT com> <02bd01c1020a$19687850$c6823bd5 AT dima> <068c01c1021e$9dccbe80$806410ac AT local> |
Subject: | Re: Need a ghostscript maintainer |
Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:03:29 +0800 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:15:47PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >Anyone interested in being the new ghostscript maintainer? > > > > > > > >The old one is too busy currently. > > > > > > > >Send me private email (?!?) if you're interested. > > > > > > No takers? Isn't anyone even curious about this? I'll have to remove > > > ghostscript from the distribution if we can't get a maintainer. > > > > Since ghostscript is fairly well supported for native win32 builds > (binaries > > could be found quite easy too) and presumely doesn't use any unix specific > > functionality, it could be possible to not provide it with Cygwin at all. > > In fact it didn't use to be provided. Users asked for it. Check the > archives. (Native ghostscript doesn't support cygwin paths for starters && > what about X support). Well, cygwin path is not the crucial argument for a user working in the win32 environment, is it? An X support is not so critical either, while we are not talking about remote displays. -- Dmitry. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |