| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Subject: | RE: pthreads works, sorta |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:32:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID: | <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A0E@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au> |
| content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 |
| X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
| X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
| Thread-Topic: | pthreads works, sorta |
| Thread-Index: | AcD+yS0CQMxphXMVSdetc62gn97W0wAAAz4Q |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | "Ross Smith" <ross DOT s AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id BAA31587 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ross Smith [mailto:ross DOT s AT ihug DOT co DOT nz] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:31 PM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: pthreads works, sorta > > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > What does all this mean? We need to catch invalid memroy access, > > Why? A program that passes an invalid thread handle is broken. > Penalising non-broken programs merely to provide better error checking > for broken ones doesn't sound reasonable to me. > Even though the POSIX behaviour is undefined for passed invalid thread variables, cygwin1.dll locking up is not a pretty way to handle failure. However, I'll consider removing the checks for non-debug builds of cygwin, but _only_ once the in-cygwin code is considered stable and complete. Until then I'm leery of having a no-check environment. Still I've found what seems to be a good alternative function that is _much_ faster, and still provides the reliability I was looking for. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |