Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B39673A.627AC7AC@nc.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:55:22 -0400
From:	Greg Smith <gsmith AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pthreads works, sorta
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F09F AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3B396607 DOT CBFC6D33 AT nc DOT rr DOT com>

Ummm, no   ;-)   Performance is now on pretty even keel with
with the Pthread-win32  implementation.  This is where our
`rogue' developer is claiming to reduce elapsed times
25% to match the elapsed times on linux.

Most of the users of our application (by it's nature)
are computer professionals and notice (ie whine) about things
like this.  (See http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/).

So now we are at the point where we can start shaving off seconds ;-)

Greg

>
> I presume this win32-pthread like performance is "good enough" ?
>
> Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -