Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:25:59 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Invitation to join the Victims group
Message-ID:	<20010625232559.A4241@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<993524432 DOT 2070 DOT 88670 DOT cd AT yahoogroups DOT com> <20010625230654 DOT B3903 AT redhat DOT com> <3B37FF77 DOT 5080704 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3B37FF77.5080704@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:20:23PM -0400

On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:20:23PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>My first thought was that *you* had done this, Chris:
>
>> Wow.  I see a new, annoying trend developing.
>> 
>> People will now start thinking that they are suffering some kind of
>> tremendous mistreatment if the quality of answers doesn't match some
>> nebulous politeness threshold.  If they don't receive any reply at all,
>> they'll contact the ACLU.
>> 
>> To answer your question: I can't duplicate this.  I only tried W2K and
>
>And then two hours later we are all invited to join the "victims" group.

<Bart voice>I didn't do it!</Bart voice>  But it is pretty funny.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -