Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:37:54 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Where do I send bug reports?
Message-ID:	<20010622103754.I13746@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010621172949 DOT B11755 AT redhat DOT com> <PLEELMPCNCACMFNMNKHFOENJCLAA DOT phubers AT solve-i-t DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<PLEELMPCNCACMFNMNKHFOENJCLAA.phubers@solve-i-t.com>; from phubers@solve-i-t.com on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:10:30AM +0200

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:10:30AM +0200, Patrick Hubers wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> >setup 2.57:
>> >from cygwin.com's home page
>>>When I run setup.exe and select to install from a local directory I
>>>select my directory I select a install directory and default file types
>>>All and Unix The package names don't show up correctly and if I click
>>>on the back button and forward again it shows the packages twice.  An
>>>older version I have seems to work better.  I also tried both on a
>>>computer without cygwin already installed same results.
>>
>>I haven't heard of any other reports of this problem.
>>
>>Has anyone else experienced this?
>
>Actually, I have.  I updated Cygwin on one machine recently and decided
>to also install it on my laptop.  Copied setup.exe and the latest and
>contrib directories to my laptop and ran setup.  No package names.  I
>then copied setup.ini (from my other machine) also to my laptop and
>then setup *did* show me package names.  Install went great, so I
>didn't really bother to investigate and report this.  Perhaps I should
>have

This is not the same thing at all.  It's been mentioned many times (and
will probably be mentioned many more) that you need setup.ini to do
anything.

This  has nothing to do with packages showing up twice or back/forward
causing things to work.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -