delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <007801c0fb06$6bb0d360$3201a8c0@eagle> |
From: | "The Jetman" <jetman AT newsguy DOT com> |
To: | "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: The Best EULA Ever |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:30:45 -0400 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 |
IANAL, but as I read it, the license stipulates that the (beta) sware can't be *distributed* w/ "potentially viral software", which since it is in beta form, is not at all unreasonable. They simply don't want beta sware to be relied upon or propagated after the beta test period. If nothing else, it is their intellectual property as much as anything created under GPL is the intellectual property of those creators, so they are entitled to make those distinctions. Having said that, I vote this subj is declared OT and left to the forums where ranting and raving about licenses and MSOFT bashing is welcome....Jet =============== From the desk of Jethro Wright, III ================ + It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a + + warning to others. + === jetman AT newsguy DOT com ================================== Anon === -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |