delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool impossible) |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:45:12 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F07C@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
Thread-Topic: | Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool impossible) |
Thread-Index: | AcD4ipOVtvWvkGX7QRyVFuz7Eq1urwAAA7Jw |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Christof Petig" <christof AT petig-baender DOT de> |
Cc: | "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA09307 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christof Petig [mailto:christof AT petig-baender DOT de] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:19 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: Cygwin > Subject: Re: Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool > impossible) > > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > Also covering glib: you need to port it. It's trying to compile for > > win32, not cygwin, and it's not configured to support libtool .dll > > creation. Ditto for iconv. See the libtool manual for information on > > that. > > Did I get you right that the e.g. the inclusion of -luser32 > prevents you > from building a cygwin dll? If so it seems that I'm stuck > with mingw for > library creation and runtime (which has already proven to be > a tough path). > I have to build gtk+ which definitely needs win32. I don't recall mentioning -luser32 as the issue :}. It was just an indicator to me that you haven't ported those applications. Cygwin compiled programs usually don't link with user32. (And yes, they can if they need to). gtk+ doesn't need win32, it runs quite nicely under X for me here (with Windows 2000 SP1). However, if you want to build a gtk+ with win32 GDI backend, you will need to port it to mingw, I believe the current win32 build is MSVC++ based. Rob > Christof > > > > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |