delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/06/19/07:49:37

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool impossible)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:45:12 +1000
Message-ID: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F07C@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool impossible)
Thread-Index: AcD4ipOVtvWvkGX7QRyVFuz7Eq1urwAAA7Jw
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Christof Petig" <christof AT petig-baender DOT de>
Cc: "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA09307

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christof Petig [mailto:christof AT petig-baender DOT de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:19 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Cygwin
> Subject: Re: Which version of Libtool to use? (or is libtool 
> impossible)
> 
> 
> Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> 
> > Also covering glib: you need to port it. It's trying to compile for
> > win32, not cygwin, and it's not configured to support libtool .dll
> > creation. Ditto for iconv. See the libtool manual for information on
> > that.
> 
> Did I get you right that the e.g. the inclusion of -luser32 
> prevents you
> from building a cygwin dll? If so it seems that I'm stuck 
> with mingw for
> library creation and runtime (which has already proven to be 
> a tough path).
> I have to build gtk+ which definitely needs win32.

I don't recall mentioning -luser32 as the issue :}. It was just an
indicator to me that you haven't ported those applications. Cygwin
compiled programs usually don't link with user32. (And yes, they can if
they need to).

gtk+ doesn't need win32, it runs quite nicely under X for me here (with
Windows 2000 SP1).
However, if you want to build a gtk+ with win32 GDI backend, you will
need to port it to mingw, I believe the current win32 build is MSVC++
based.

Rob
 
> Christof
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019