Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/06/18/11:34:11
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page.
For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list. I've also Cc'ed this reply there.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:31:38PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
>Hi Ralf, Chris,
>
>I'm not very active on the Cygwin lists, but I'm seeing a lot of mail about
>KDE on Cygwin.
>
>As a user with one foot in Windows and one in Linux, this has really pricked
>my attention.
>
>Can you please tell me - is there a KDE implementation available for Windows
>over Cygwin, or is it still in early development? Also, does it need any
>particular X implementation, or will any of the Windows X's work?
>
>Also, if there are any applicable websites, please send some URLs.
>Any info you have would be gratefully received.
>
>Thanks and regards
>David
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT saght DOT tessag DOT com>
>To: "Cygwin-Apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
>Cc: "egor duda" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 18:18
>Subject: AW: accept() failed message on kde 1.1.2 ??
>
>
>> Hi Egor,
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Sunday, 17 June, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:
>> >
>> > CF> Is there any traction on this problem? I see that Suhaib has
>released
>> > CF> a new version of XFree86 which turns off UNIX-domain sockets, which
>> > CF> is unfortunate.
>> >
>> > CF> Do we know what is causing the problems that we're seeing?
>> >
>> > i still can't reproduce it :(, so only one thing i can suggest is to
>> > disable security checks for now. I hope, however, that somebody can
>> > either debug this problem himself or provide a reproducible testcase,
>> > so i can debug it myself.
>> >
>> > BTW, Ralf, are those sockets that fail in you test work in blocking or
>> > non-blocking mode?
>> >
>> on weekend I had not time to look in detail
>>
>> Currently I have found that after accept sometimes one of the following
>> messages occures :
>>
>> #define ENOSYS 88 /* Function not implemented */
>>
>> #define ECONNABORTED 113 /* Connection aborted */
>>
>>
>> I will look more.
>>
>> Ralf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -