Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:26:56 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: MinGW vs. -mno-cygwin (Was: GCC 2.95.3-4 Problem)
Message-ID:	<20010613002656.D4531@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20010613104400 DOT 00a12150 AT 192 DOT 168 DOT 1 DOT 1>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.0.20010613104400.00a12150@192.168.1.1>; from ecognito1@earthcorp.com on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:46:36AM +1000

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:46:36AM +1000, E wrote:
>cfg wrote:
>>So, probably the FAQ should suggest that -mno-cygwin uses a
>>subset of the functionality found at www.mingw.org.  Before people
>>report problems with -mno-cygwin they should 1) check the cygwin
>>mailing list archives and 2) check the mingw web site.  Also, adding
>>words about the libstdc++.a library might help.
>
>Also including a link to 
><http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/mno-cygwin-howto.txt> 
>which describes how to get around the libstdc++.a problems may also be useful.

No.  This is riddled with out-of-date information.  We shouldn't be linking to
*anything* which mentions B20.1.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -