delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/06/10/01:07:24

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:00:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: setup.exe 2.57 - too many connections error....
Message-ID: <20010610010012.E29397@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200105272101 DOT f4RL1Si25119 AT rtl DOT cygnus DOT com> <200105291446 DOT HAA05749 AT cygnus DOT com> <20010529204437 DOT A14105 AT redhat DOT com> <3B21D0A5 DOT 119D8C60 AT attglobal DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B21D0A5.119D8C60@attglobal.net>; from teiffel@attglobal.net on Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:30:45AM -0500

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:30:45AM -0500, Pietrobon Marcello wrote:
>I confirm the problem.
>
>Is the code of setup.exe available ? Where ?

Of course not, I was just taunting you by suggesting such a thing...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=source+code+for+setup+cygwin

cgf

>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 08:19:48AM -0600, Mark Paulus wrote:
>>>Has the threading of this version changed is behaviour??  I like to use
>>>ftp.nas.nasa.gov as my mirror of choice, and now I'm getting this
>>>strange behaviour where I seem to keep getting an error message 530
>>>"Sorry: No more than two simultaneous connections per host are
>>>allowed".  Any ideas as to why this is occurring??
>>
>>I just checked this and I can't see anything that would account for
>>this behavior.  It's hard to know for sure, though.  If someone wants
>>to debug the code and see if there is a missing closesocket()
>>somewhere, that would be very helpful.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019