Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:40:10 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) limit
Message-ID:	<20010607214010.D22831@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<7F2B9185F0196F44B59990759B91B1C2505CD1 AT ins-exch DOT inspirepharm DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<7F2B9185F0196F44B59990759B91B1C2505CD1@ins-exch.inspirepharm.com>; from ssiddiqi@inspirepharm.com on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:06:30PM -0400

I checked into this.  sysconf() is returning the current size of the
fd table.  The fd table starts at 32 and is extended as needed.

I don't know what sysconf should return, actually.  The number of
possible fds is obviously not infinite but it is pretty large.  Perhaps
we should just return an arbitrary large number like 4096 or something.

cgf

On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:06:30PM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
>Thanks Rob,
>For me 255 was enough ;-)
>
>Suhaib
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:04 PM
>> To: Suhaib Siddiqi; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Re: sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) limit
>> 
>> I think it's newlib that provides sysconf....
>> 
>> I'll see if I have time this weekend to dig into where the 32 is coming
>> from. 8192 /16384 sound good for the value returned?
>> 
>> Rob
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Suhaib Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi AT inspirepharm DOT com>
>> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:56 AM
>> Subject: sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) limit
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > According to private communication with Chris, Cygwin has no fd limit.
>> >
>> > However, we have a sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) issue for Cygwin/XFree86:
>> >
>> > why sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) only returns 32 then. XFree86 returns errors
>> once
>> > max limit is hit.  One way to over come this is to hack the
>> connections.c in
>> > Xfree86, However, shouldn't
>> > this be bumped up in the Cygwin rather than making changes in source
>> code
>> > outside of
>> > it. Maybe other people will come across the same problem in other
>> > applications.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>> > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>> >
>> >
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

-- 
cgf AT cygnus DOT com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -