Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:27:31 -0400
Message-Id:	<200106080127.VAA01308@greed.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT redhat DOT com>
To:	gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com,
	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Another RFC: regex in libiberty

[More lists added to get a wider audience]

I didn't get a clear feeling about what people wanted wrt this.  I saw
three people propose three versions of regex, not much to go on.  Is
this a big deal?  Will it really get used by everyone who currently
has their own regex?  Is it important to try to use a BSD-licensed
regex to minimize future problems?

The two contenders seem to be a modified GNU regex and the
ever-popular Henry Spencer's regex.  Does anyone have any strong
opinions for either of these, or against any regex in libiberty at
all?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -