Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<004a01c0ee2d$9cbfac00$8430273f@ca.boeing.com>
From:	"Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<AMEJJPNGNLDBOGHOMLFLEEMFEDAA DOT lrk AT pobox DOT com><009101c0eafc$a3409230$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com><20010601205630 DOT A6978 AT redhat DOT com><001801c0eb03$951d79a0$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com><5583-Mon04Jun2001103301+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk><006e01c0ece6$cef04560$893a243f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <7761-Tue05Jun2001103147+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <009501c0edb3$e9b3d6a0$646e1a3f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010605191624 DOT A14939 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Setup 2.57 woes...
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:05:46 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 16:16
Subject: Re: Setup 2.57 woes...

> On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:37:11AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "David Starks-Browning" <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
> >To: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
> >Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 02:31
> >Subject: Re: Setup 2.57 woes...
> >
> >
> >> On Monday 4 Jun 01, Michael A. Chase writes:
> >>>The final comment in that thread from Chris was that the FAQ is still
> >>>correct.  It's just that now that setup.exe honors existing mount
> >>>points, someone who 'knows what their doing' can split /usr/bin/ and
> >>>/bin/.  If you mention that it is possible, you should also mention
> >>>that it is strongly not recommended.
> >>
> >>I won't mention that it's possible to change anything.  I will simply
> >>remove the FAQ entry "Setup screwed up my mounts!" because it shouldn't
> >>do that any more.
> >
> >I wouldn't take it out quite yet.  The behavior when the user asks for
> >a new Cygwin root hasn't been completely settled yet.  It might change
> >in a way that looks like the old behavior.
>
> How so?  It should replace the root and leave other mounts alone.

So it would be ok to go from

   / -> c:\cygwin\
   /usr/bin/ -> c:\cygwin\bin\
   /usr/lib/ -> c:\cygwin\lib\
   /c/ -> c:\

to

   / -> c:\new_cygwin\
   /usr/bin/ -> c:\cygwin\bin\
   /usr/lib/ -> c:\cygwin\lib\
   /c/ -> c:\

I would want to replace any mounts that are physically under / when
installing to a new Cygwin root.

> David's analysis is correct.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -