Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:16:24 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setup 2.57 woes...
Message-ID:	<20010605191624.A14939@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<AMEJJPNGNLDBOGHOMLFLEEMFEDAA DOT lrk AT pobox DOT com><009101c0eafc$a3409230$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com><20010601205630 DOT A6978 AT redhat DOT com><001801c0eb03$951d79a0$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com><5583-Mon04Jun2001103301+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk><006e01c0ece6$cef04560$893a243f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <7761-Tue05Jun2001103147+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <009501c0edb3$e9b3d6a0$646e1a3f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<009501c0edb3$e9b3d6a0$646e1a3f@ca.boeing.com>; from mchase@ix.netcom.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:37:11AM -0700

On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:37:11AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Starks-Browning" <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
>To: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
>Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 02:31
>Subject: Re: Setup 2.57 woes...
>
>
>> On Monday 4 Jun 01, Michael A. Chase writes:
>>>The final comment in that thread from Chris was that the FAQ is still
>>>correct.  It's just that now that setup.exe honors existing mount
>>>points, someone who 'knows what their doing' can split /usr/bin/ and
>>>/bin/.  If you mention that it is possible, you should also mention
>>>that it is strongly not recommended.
>>
>>I won't mention that it's possible to change anything.  I will simply
>>remove the FAQ entry "Setup screwed up my mounts!" because it shouldn't
>>do that any more.
>
>I wouldn't take it out quite yet.  The behavior when the user asks for
>a new Cygwin root hasn't been completely settled yet.  It might change
>in a way that looks like the old behavior.

How so?  It should replace the root and leave other mounts alone.

David's analysis is correct.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -