Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<006e01c0ece6$cef04560$893a243f@ca.boeing.com>
From:	"Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To:	"David Starks-Browning" <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<AMEJJPNGNLDBOGHOMLFLEEMFEDAA DOT lrk AT pobox DOT com><009101c0eafc$a3409230$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com><20010601205630 DOT A6978 AT redhat DOT com><001801c0eb03$951d79a0$7556273f AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <5583-Mon04Jun2001103301+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: Setup 2.57 woes...
Date:	Mon, 4 Jun 2001 04:09:10 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

The final comment in that thread from Chris was that the FAQ is still
correct.  It's just that now that setup.exe honors existing mount points,
someone who 'knows what their doing' can split /usr/bin/ and /bin/.  If you
mention that it is possible, you should also mention that it is strongly not
recommended.

--
Mac :})
Give a hobbit a fish and he'll eat fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he'll eat fish for an age.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Starks-Browning" <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
To: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 02:33
Subject: Re: Setup 2.57 woes...


> On Friday 1 Jun 01, Michael A. Chase writes:
> > > >The FAQ describes why /bin/ and /usr/bin/ (and /lib/ and
> > > >/usr/lib/) need to point to the same directory.  If you insist on
> > > >keeping them separate, you are making your installation
> > > >unsupportable.
> > >
> > > Actually setup should honor existing mounts now, fwiw.
> >
> > Perhaps that section of the FAQ could be re-written now.
>
> Thanks, I'm aware of the discrepancy, I plan to fix it.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -