Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20010531155342.03889f98@ks.teknowledge.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2001 16:01:21 -0700
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Addressing Layout in 1.3.x
In-Reply-To:	<20010531175843.B26180@redhat.com>
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010531132733 DOT 03877550 AT ks DOT teknowledge DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010531090143 DOT 0263bf78 AT ks DOT teknowledge DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010531090143 DOT 0263bf78 AT ks DOT teknowledge DOT com>
	<20010531150106 DOT O23914 AT redhat DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010531132733 DOT 03877550 AT ks DOT teknowledge DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Chris,

OK. That is pretty much what I expected, but an XSB emulator hacker out 
there was having problems that seemed like the could possibly have been 
related to addressing issues of this sort, so I said I'd investigate. I 
guess that the only reason I had any suspicion was some vague hunch based 
on the existence of the "heap_chunk_in_mb" registry entry--perhaps just 
it's granularity.

Thanks for taking the time to figure out what I was after.

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 14:58 2001-05-31, you wrote:
>On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:08:21PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >Chris,
> >
> >Let me try asking it this way...
> >
> > ...
> >
> >Does that clarify my question?
>
>Slightly, but the answer is still "I don't know".  We're using the Win32
>API.  We don't interact with the OS in any way other than through the
>OS, with the exception being that we do manipulate the stack in strange
>ways for signals.  We've done this since 1.1.4 or so.
>
>So, none of what you have mentioned above should have any bearing on
>normal cygwin operation in any version of Cygwin from B16.0 on.
>
>cgf


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -