Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B1518B1.E398BB35@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2001 11:58:41 -0400
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Karl M <karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup 2.57 question
References:	<F216f0MjkatwD43oFLa00009c32 AT hotmail DOT com>

Karl M wrote:
> 
> Hi All...
> 
> When I use the new setup (very nice now), I have one question...automake,
> mutt, ncftp, perl, popt and wget don't get installed, but they used to. It
> looks like they are labeled as experimental--is that the correct
> classification?

Well, "correct" is a relative term...

Currently, the ncftp, popt, and wget directories contain only a single
version, and that version is labeled experimental.  That means that they
will not get installed (or displayed) by default.  You have to click on
the "Exp" radio button, and then they will show up, and then you can
install them.

However, I suppose it's time to remove the experimental tag -- I haven't
received any <more> complaints about the behavior of those three
packages.  I just forgot to mark them "current" once my self-imposed
"beta-test" period ended.

I dunno about perl, mutt, or automake; those aren't "my" packages.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -