Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2001 22:45:50 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	jordan AT lisa DOT gemair DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problems with Apache 1.3.20
Message-ID:	<20010528224550.A2275@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, jordan AT lisa DOT gemair DOT com
References:	<3B12E7C7 DOT 18333 DOT 15EAE187 AT localhost> <200105290135 DOT VAA07469 AT lisa DOT gemair DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<200105290135.VAA07469@lisa.gemair.com>; from jordan@lisa.gemair.com on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 09:35:06PM -0400

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 09:35:06PM -0400, Jordan Henderson wrote:
>> All known problems for me with 1.3.19. Better you define the hostname in
>> httpd.conf.
>> I work around the install errors in fiddeling around in the makefiles to
>> set an .exe to every executable, so it works for me.
>
>Ah, yes, a common error with cygwin.  Didn't an older version of cygwin/gcc 
>produce executables without the .exe extension?  If I'm remembering 
>correctly, why was this changed?

If you are remembering correctly, then your memory is two or three years
old at the very least.  That water has long since passed under the
bridge.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -