Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2001 11:35:38 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ssh hanging--a workaround
Message-ID:	<20010528113538.A7365@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<F208YL9iVWQ24WwpnGv00005e95 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<F208YL9iVWQ24WwpnGv00005e95@hotmail.com>; from karlm30@hotmail.com on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0700

On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>  I forced select to return by setting a timeout. The 
> timeout does force it to return--and in fact, there is IO waiting to be 
> processed.

You're telling that IO is available so select should return but
it doesn't?

>  It is not an ssh bug as far as I can tell.

No, it seems to be a Cygwin problem.

> Also, in the past, I needed pipes and you did not. Now we all have pipes. 
> But why do you think that in the past, I needed pipes and you did not?

Dunno. Since I never had a problem using socketpair on my machines
I could never reproduce that. I'm using pipes instead of socketpairs
by default now because pipes seem to work for nearly all people
and pipes are way faster than socketpairs, at least on W2K.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -