delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/05/26/21:22:54

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B105731.A3E5DAB6@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 21:24:02 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred T. Hamster" <fred AT gruntose DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin Setup 2.54
References: <990908849 DOT 14828 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B10426C DOT 7080008 AT gruntose DOT com>

"Fred T. Hamster" wrote:
>   is the official installation process now involving a bunch of registry
> edits before cygwin can be installed again, or is this setup program
> actually quite busted?

It appears that the new setup program is not operating correctly for
SOME users.  This may be because setup itself is broken, or because the
affected users have some wierdness in their local machine.

In my case, I just used the new setup.exe to update a pre-existing
install (that is, I used it to install the most recent inetutils,
openssh, and python packages -- I already had older versions of those
packages installed).

It worked flawlessly.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019