Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2001 11:20:54 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres processes immediately
Message-ID:	<20010515112054.G31266@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<E94FF01DFF6CD31186F4080009DC361502086B8D AT nttwr2 DOT tower DOT bldgs DOT butlermfg DOT org> <20010510112639 DOT A26981 AT enteract DOT com> <20010510123102 DOT B15024 AT redhat DOT com> <20010510123628 DOT A48047 AT enteract DOT com> <20010510140721 DOT F12136 AT redhat DOT com> <00c101c0d9a6$44a44a30$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<00c101c0d9a6$44a44a30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:09:28AM +1000

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:09:28AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Blueskying a concept here: what about cygwin opening all sockets in
> non-blocking mode, and if the app thinks that it is a blocking call wait
> on the socket && on a signal event?
> 
> Obviously not trivial to get working right, but
> a) would it work on 95?
> b) thoughts?

b) I have just applied a patch to Cygwin which uses overlapped IO
   together with the Winsock2 calls WSARecv, WSARecvFrom, WSASend
   and WSASendTo if available. The new mechanism is interruptable
   by signals. If Winsock2 is not available the new implementation
   just falls back to using the non-inerruptable Winsock1 calls.

   I would like to ask people to test it especially in conjunction
   with PostgreSQL, which I haven't set up.

   Note that this patch does not change the behaviour of direct
   NT service processes (inetd, cygrunsrv) to be not interruptable
   by signals!

a) Win95 will participate if the users have updated their system to
   OSR2 or installed a newer IE or "Winsock2 for 95" from the
   Microsoft web pages.

   OTOH, if we only implement things which are available in older
   OS versions, too, we would never be able to provide some new
   features of newer OSes to the Cygwin users.

   As the bottom line, adding functionality sometimes means: "Sorry,
   only available since 98 (W2K, XP)..."

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -