Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20010507102108.02107940@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2001 10:21:33 -0400
To:	"bowman" <bowman AT montana DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.3.1: gcc-2.95.3-4 bug with scanf() for floating-point
	numbers on Win2k
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<00b501c0d6fc$650b0ea0$0100a8c0@mshome.net>
References:	<3AF545B3 DOT D4577F40 AT whsc DOT vic DOT edu DOT au>
	<3AF69A2B DOT 6E135D8C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 09:48 AM 5/7/2001, bowman wrote:
>From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
> >  In fact, somebody else who ALSO refused to
> > search in the mailing list archives asked this question less than 12
> > hours ago.
>
>Perhaps an readily accessible  page of known bugs would be more effective
>than searching mail archives? I'd estimate my success on searching archives
>to be about 50%, with many hits on non-relevant headers, and quite a bit of
>searching through threads for the answer, not the question.



Contributions in this regard are certainly welcome.



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -