Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<000701c0d415$92d1ab30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<000101c0d3d0$b905d780$a300a8c0 AT nhv>
Subject:	Re: May need a ghostscript maintainer
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2001 23:28:16 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	03 May 2001 21:05:54.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7401730:01C0D414]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: May need a ghostscript maintainer


> Earnie Boyd writes:
> >
>
> I believe this is the norm an is the 'approved' ghostscript 'way'
>
> FYI in 'true' hacker style all I did to get this to work was
>  1) start with the supplied unix-gcc.mak
>  2) remove all 'X" references
>  3) add appropriate references to Chucks jpeg png and zlib ports
>  4) rename it cygwin.mak
>  5) with Rob Collins help work around some then missing thread stuff
>      < as of Cygwin 1.3 this is no longer necessary  :-)) >
>
> Hopefully the 'official' porter of Ghostscript will get the library to
build
> as a DLL but in the interim I thought that this would obliviate the
need
> for a ghostscript package at all as this method just WORKS !!
>
> Anyway since this appears to be controversial
> I will NOT submit a patch to the ghostscript team
> and remain content with my personal installation

It doesn't seem very controversial to me: just the usual

"this isn't the most-easy-for-novice-package-foo-users"

"Well it is for this package because-its-in-the-dark-ages"

"ok. What about feature foo"

:].

I'd strongly suggest you submit a patch to the packge authors - as long
as disabling the X stuff is a compile time option, not a
cygwin-platform-dependent-option.
(I happen to have X :])

As for the makefile name, just follow the naming convention for the
package :]]

Doing this will make the new ghostscript maintainers job easier! Thanks
for getting out and doing this...

Rob

> Cheers
>
> Norman Vine
>
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -