Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3AF1515B.42137DE5@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 May 2001 06:38:51 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
Organization:	-ENOENT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	egor duda <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010501102110 DOT 02e99390 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com> <17105307514 DOT 20010501224113 AT logos-m DOT ru>

egor duda wrote:
> 
> i wholeheartedly agree that lots of cygwin users will benefit from
> rock-stable cygwin. the main question is "what cygwin team should do
> for this?" 

To answer this it might be helpful to know where Cygwin is going.  I
assume that the overall goal is stepwise refinement towards Linuxness or
similar.  So, how far are we from that goal?
-- 
= Warren -- Video articles: http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/video/
= 
= ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -