delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
X-Apparently-From: | <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <3AF14B2F.167981ED@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 03 May 2001 08:12:31 -0400 |
From: | Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | nhv AT cape DOT com |
CC: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: May need a ghostscript maintainer |
References: | <000801c0d37d$f8019580$a300a8c0 AT nhv> |
Norman Vine wrote: > > Christopher Faylor writes: > >> > >Is anyone willing to maintain this? We need to provide an X-less > >version of ghostscript. Norman Vine has managed to do this, so it is > >not an impossible feat: > > > >http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/gs6.62/ > > > >If someone would like to volunteer to do this, please respond to this > >thread. > > FYI > I just downloaded the ghostscript 7.0 source and for the heck of it > just tried the makefile linked from my page with out applying any of > the other fixes that I mention > > Lo and behold gs compiled and made pdf's of all the examples. :-)) > > This was on a binary mounted drive so there may be a fopen bug > lurking somewhere but .... > > My question to the list is > "Should I submit my makefile to the ghostscript maintainers > for inclusion in the main ghostscript distribution as cygwin.mak" > Yuck!! How about modifying the configure.in to do the right thing for Cygwin?! > Then I believe to get a functional ghostscript one would only > need to unpack the tarball and do > > % ln -s src/cygwin.mak > % make > The reason I don't like this much is that it makes me too dependent on your configuration and I wouldn't do it by default because it's not the norm. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |