Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: May need a ghostscript maintainer
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2001 23:05:53 -0400
Message-ID:	<000801c0d37d$f8019580$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
In-reply-to:	<20010423161323.A24872@redhat.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance:	Normal

Christopher Faylor writes:
>>
>Is anyone willing to maintain this?  We need to provide an X-less
>version of ghostscript.  Norman Vine has managed to do this, so it is
>not an impossible feat:
>
>http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/gs6.62/
>
>If someone would like to volunteer to do this, please respond to this
>thread.  

FYI
I just downloaded the ghostscript 7.0 source and for the heck of it
just tried the makefile linked from my page with out applying any of 
the other fixes that I mention

Lo and behold gs compiled and made pdf's of all the examples. :-))

This was on a binary mounted drive so there may be a fopen bug
lurking somewhere but ....

My question to the list is 
"Should I submit my makefile to the ghostscript maintainers
for inclusion in the main ghostscript distribution as cygwin.mak"

Then I believe to get a functional ghostscript one would only
need to unpack the tarball and do

% ln -s src/cygwin.mak
% make

Cheers

Norman Vine



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -