Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<05b101c0d260$e10d1c00$100b07d5@andreas>
From:	"Andreas Eibach" <a DOT eibach AT gmx DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2001 19:05:08 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

HI,

after reading several ghostscript threads in this mailing list for a while,
I ask myself if it isn't at least a bit questionable to really include
ghostscript in setup.exe. Facts are, that - on a standard Cygwin
distribution (i. e. _without_ X) there simply IS NO ready-to-use version of
ghostscript.

Norman Vine (thank you!) has managed to build a non-X ghostscript, however,
you must build it yourself and the binary distributed with Cygwin will ONLY
work with an X installation due to internal references to /usr/X11R6/*. IOW,
a non-X user can just move the binary to the trashcan because it won't make
use to him/her because it complains about a missing XFree DLL, LIBICE.DLL.

I suggest to either include a _non-X_ version or omit it because "the way it
comes", it's unusable for people who don't have X.

Andreas



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -