Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2001 00:04:37 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
Message-ID:	<20010501000437.C5077@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010430105401 DOT 00eb8220 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com> <3AEE2E6F DOT 1044C4C6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3AEE2E6F.1044C4C6@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:33:03PM -0400

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:33:03PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>>Each time I install, something might be fixed but something else
>>breaks.  For instance C-c - using C-c in cygwin is completely
>>fundamental to its usability and yet it has been fairly broken in the
>>last two versions I have installed (1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1);
>
>You are unfortunately correct about the ^C issue.  However, (and this
>is the really strange thing) it got fixed in the snapshots *prior* to
>1.3.1 IIRC, but then broke AGAIN at 1.3.1...but is NOW fixed (again) in
>the snapshots.  I think.  :-P

WHAT ^C issue?  What are we talking about?????

The only issue I'm aware of is being unable to stop a cygwin process if
all of its standard input/output has been redirected.  That was fixed
a couple of days ago but it was hardly a new problem.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -