delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:44:40 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? |
Message-ID: | <20010430154440.A32086@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20010430105401 DOT 00eb8220 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010430105401.00eb8220@san-francisco.beasys.com>; from andyp@bea.com on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:00AM -0700 |
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:00AM -0700, Andy Piper wrote: >Don't get me wrong - I love cygwin and think Chris and co have done a >marvellous jobs, but as a user who simply wants cygwin to work well I >have never installed a version that actually has all the signifcant >bugs squashed. Each time I install, something might be fixed but >something else breaks. For instance C-c - using C-c in cygwin is >completely fundamental to its usability and yet it has been fairly >broken in the last two versions I have installed (1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1); What does "fairly broken" mean? I'm aware of only one problem which I announced a fix for a couple of days ago. >the headers change the whole time so that trying to maintain anything >that builds under cygwin is a complete nightmare. What does "the headers change the whole time" mean? What specifically caused you problems? Was it the move of headers to /usr/include/w32api? FWIW, the 1.3.1 release of Cygwin was a major release. That's one of the reasons that we incremented the middle number. We expected problems. There are problems. We'll be making a 1.3.2 release soon. Whether it fixes your problems or not is unknown at this point since I have no clear idea what your problems are. Without specific feedback we can't fix specific problems, so your specific problems are not specifically fixed. Perhaps you might want to try a snapshot. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |