Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.2.7.2.20010430105401.00eb8220@san-francisco.beasys.com>
X-Sender:	andyp AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:02:00 -0700
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
Subject:	When will cygwin ever be stable?
Mime-Version:	1.0

Don't get me wrong - I love cygwin and think Chris and co have done a 
marvellous jobs, but as a user who simply wants cygwin to work well I have 
never installed a version that actually has all the signifcant bugs 
squashed. Each time I install, something might be fixed but something else 
breaks. For instance C-c - using C-c in cygwin is completely fundamental to 
its usability and yet it has been fairly broken in the last two versions I 
have installed (1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1); the headers change the whole time so 
that trying to maintain anything that builds under cygwin is a complete 
nightmare. I could go on, but the point is that all of these features have 
worked at one time or other, but there doesn't seem to ever be a release 
that squashes them all. Am I hoping in vain?

Yours frustratedly,

andy


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -