Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/04/29/21:26:07
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:36AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:29 AM
>> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Re: Some comments about the current release
>>
>>
>>>easy. There are 0 full time cygwin-net-release programmers. Chris is
>>>a manager (who codes quite well :] ), Corinna as I understand it is
>>>there for the embedded system development, but is able to hack on
>>>cygwin (For which we should _all_ be grateful!). And the rest, well we
>>>are all volunteers with some particular itch we want to scratch.
>>
>>Actually, Corinna and I (and DJ) are volunteers, too. I'm personally
>>working on some signal and path name issues right now but performance
>>degradataion does bother me. I hate tracking it down, though.
>
>Hmm, I must have been unclear - I thought that "0 full time
>cygwin-net-release-programmers" would imply that everyone is a
>volunteer?
No, you were clear. This is my poor-reading-skill-itis acting up again.
>>Also, Corinna is a Cygwin engineer, gdb engineer in training. We don't
>>have much Cygwin-specific work at Red Hat currently so she's slowly
>>transitioning to gdb.
>
>Sorry Corinna! I muddled my description - I mean cygwin engineer, with
>the focus being for the GnuPro tools - would that have been more
>accurate? Thanks for the detail Chris.
Well.... Cygwin is technically a GNUpro tool so...
It doesn't really matter. Your point was clear. I probably didn't need
to "clarify" anything.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -