Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3AEC5281.70A0DF80@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:42:25 -0400
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tar and symlinks
References:	<3AEAF51B DOT F82E3C04 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010428131012 DOT A20786 AT redhat DOT com> <3AEAFB36 DOT 2ACF1046 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010428133617 DOT A20972 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> So, maybe in three months or so we'll upgrade setup.exe to use the new
> >> style but, for now, I think it is doing the right thing.
> >
> >Sounds ok to me.  BUT, tar.exe all by itself behaves the same way.  Is
> >that *also* the "right thing"?  I'm not sure.
> 
> Hmm.  I should have checked out what you were saying a little more to
> avoid another round of email.
> 
> My version of tar creates the new style symlinks.  I just extracted the
> cygwin-1.3.1.-1.tar.gz file into a dummy directory.  The symlink files
> in the lib directory were 'libm.a.lnk', 'libc.a.lnk', etc.  I verified
> this with the 'dir' command.

Yes.  I dunno what happened earlier, but I went back and did more
thorough tests on both NT/1.3.1 and W2K/1.3.1 and indeed tar does do the
right thing.

Tar is uses new style symlinks (without the CYGWIN= flag).  Setup
naturally still uses old-style.  Sorry for the noise.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -