Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2001 00:33:26 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.3.1 bug in fscanf("%lf", &a)
Message-ID:	<20010428003326.B12841@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<03781128C7B74B4DBC27C55859C9D738D4296E AT es06snlnt> <3AE9ED59 DOT 7D8C51D6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3AE9ED59.7D8C51D6@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:06:17PM -0400

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:06:17PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>This is probably related to the ongoing thread "bug report: sscanf
>problem with cygwin 1.3.1-1".  All *scanf() functions will have a
>similar bug.  Me, I'm still waiting on the build of my debuggable kernel
>to finish (us poor grad students don't own fast computers....) Has
>anybody had a chance to debug the __svfscanf_r() routine?

I haven't debugged it.  Maybe I should submit another bug report with
a different subject.

How about

Subject:  What gives with scanf in cygwin 1.31?

That has a nice ring to it and I'm sure that the repetition will serve
to motivate someone.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -