Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.2.0.58.20010425135705.00d36990@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Sender:	muller AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:09:48 +0200
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
Subject:	Re: Symbol link trouble ?
In-Reply-To:	<20010425131337.O23753@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References:	<4 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 58 DOT 20010425122954 DOT 00b3de80 AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<4 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 58 DOT 20010425105548 DOT 0177e8a0 AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<4 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 58 DOT 20010425105548 DOT 0177e8a0 AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<20010425122831 DOT M23753 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<4 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 58 DOT 20010425122954 DOT 00b3de80 AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 13:13 25/04/01 , vous avez écrit:
>On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 12:40:40PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >
> > >Aaargh! Really? I don't have any 95 for testing purposes so
> > >I can't look for this. Did you ever think about upgrading to
> > >OSR2, 98, ME, NT, W2K? Ok, ok, seriously, if you can't live
> >
> > OS version is 4.00.950 B
> >    B means OSR 2, no ?
>
>I think so.
>
> > >with that, you should set your CYGWIN environment variable to
> > >contain "nowinsymlinks". In that case, the old symlink method
> > >is used again.
> >
> >   Adding nowinsymlinks to CYGWIN env variable does
> > indeed cure the problem !
> >
> >    I also find this bug quite strange:
> > the wrong destination to the symbolic link is
> > kept even if cygwin DLL is unloaded from memory
> > (at least Taskinfo does not see this file as open anymore !)
> > Where can this information be kept then ???
>
>Could be a buffering technique of W95. I have just read the Microsoft
>KB article Q128932 "How Windows 95 Resolves Shortcut Links" but it
>doesn't obtain any additional information.

  Using strace seems to indicate that the file test.h.lnk is read!
Should I send you the binary link file and the strace output.



Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -