Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/04/23/11:42:23
DJ,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:30:10AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The GPL talks about works, not executables. It doesn't matter if
> readline.dll is a separate file, it's still part of the same work -
> maybe. IMHO, the test is this: delete readline.dll and run python.
> Does it run?
Yes.
> Does it function normally?
Yes, albeit without GNU readline support.
> If so, readline.dll isn't
> part of the work. If not, it's all one work, regardless of how many
> files it is.
>
> If they're separate, the mere aggregation of python.exe and
> readline.dll in the same media (a tarball in this case) is acceptable
> regardless of licenses.
Just be clear, readline.dll is the Cygwin Python readline module
which should not be confused with the Cygwin GNU readline library,
cygreadline4.dll. However, if I delete either of these files, python
still functions correctly:
$ python
Python 2.1 (#1, Apr 17 2001, 09:45:01)
[GCC 2.95.3-2 (cygwin special)] on cygwin_nt-4.01
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
Module readline not available. # <--- *** warning not error ***
>>>
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -