Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Support in gcc for 586
References:	<200104221604 DOT JAA10695 AT mail7 DOT bigmailbox DOT com>
	<20010422123312 DOT A24385 AT redhat DOT com> <m3n198n8vv DOT fsf AT master DOT athome>
	<20010422183507 DOT A25103 AT redhat DOT com>
From:	Andrew Markebo <flognat AT flognat DOT myip DOT org>
Date:	23 Apr 2001 08:56:18 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20010422183507.A25103@redhat.com>
Message-ID:	<m31yqkkstp.fsf@master.athome>
Lines:	19
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version:	1.0

/ Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
| [...]
| >
| >Humm..  I just checked my gcc.
| >
| >flognat AT CUTIE2K /usr/lib/gcc-lib $ gcc --version 2.95.3-2
| >flognat AT CUTIE2K /usr/lib/gcc-lib $ ls /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ i686-pc-cygwin
| >
| >Smells like 686 compiled??
| 
| Did you actually TRY THIS?

Sorry, I assumed that the subdir in /usr/lib/gcc-lib indicated the
_target_ that gcc was built _for_. (like if you built a cross-compiler
for m68k on a 686, where should it be placed?)

I can test it on an old 586 later on today, and back off.. 

        /Andy

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -