Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<002601c0cba0$b0bc24e0$5b1efd9d@winbox>
Reply-To:	"Nicolay Giraldo" <ngiraldo AT virtualis DOT com>
From:	"Nicolay Giraldo" <ni-giral AT uniandes DOT edu DOT co>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Support in gcc for 586
Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:52:07 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3

>Did you actually TRY THIS?
>
>Cygwin was built with this compiler.  I haven't seen anyone complaining
>that Cygwin didn't operate on a "Pentium MMX".
>
>If you are actually having some sort of problem, then post it here.
>Otherwise, it appears that you are making incorrect assumptions about
>the way that gcc operates.
>


Yes, it is another kind of problem.
I have just 4 days with cygwin, so please forgive me.

I'm running postgresql, so I have to use cygwin 1.1.7 (thats what 
this list's archives says and works for now)

Yesterday I downloaded gcc, and it didn't worked, so I though it has
something to do with the lib/686 files, cause the errors were 
noticed there.

But the problem is the last gcc is linked against the last cygwin,
now I'm using an older gcc and it compiles things right.

Thanks for your patience.

Nicolay


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -