Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Kendall Bennett" <KendallB AT scitechsoft DOT com>
Organization:	SciTech Software, Inc.
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:24:31 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Cross compiler for Linux?
Message-ID:	<3ADAE47F.20309.32A304D6@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<3AD4A9EE.5164.1A4E40C0@localhost>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)

Hi Guys,

I didn't get a response to this email. Does that mean that no-one is 
presently cross compiling Linux apps from a Win32 box at all? Any 
info or pointers on where to look to find out how to build a cross 
compiler with GCC will be vastly appreciated...

> Hi Guys,
> 
> We are in the process of attempting to use Cygwin as a cross compile 
> development environment for Linux using a Windows 2000 machine for 
> development. Our plan is to target initially Red Hat 7.0, but we 
> would like to support all distributions with one binary. Hence our 
> plan is to simply staticly link the runtime libraries we use into our 
> programs instead of dynamically linking the code to avoid issues with 
> libc5, glibc2 glibc2.1 etc etc. We would also like to be able to 
> remote debug from the Windows 2000 machine to the Linux box using 
> TCP/IP (probably with GVD or Insight; does Insight support this?)
> 
> So if anyone has any experience in this area or can point me to the 
> appropriate FAQ's and documentation on doing this it would be 
> appreciated. Also my plan initially is to start with the latest 
> version of GCC/Binutils etc source code that already builds for 
> Cygwin as the basis of the cross-compiler rather than using the Red 
> Hat source code (definately not 2.96 from RH 7.0 ;-). Does that plan 
> make sense, or should we start with a different version of the 
> compiler? What about the binutils stuff, will the versions that are 
> used for Cygwin work OK if we re-target and compile them for Linux?
> 
> Thanks!

+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|   SciTech Software - Building Truly Plug'n'Play Software!     |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Kendall Bennett          | Email: KendallB AT scitechsoft DOT com    |
| Director of Engineering  | Phone: (530) 894 8400              |
| SciTech Software, Inc.   | Fax  : (530) 894 9069              |
| 505 Wall Street          | ftp  : ftp.scitechsoft.com         |
| Chico, CA 95928, USA     | www  : http://www.scitechsoft.com  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -