Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/04/15/15:36:30
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 06:44:50PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:07:28AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:22:58AM +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> >Thanks for the observations. Seems to me to confirm Corinna's
>> >original belief that somehow Cygwin is getting the wrong WINSOCK
>> >library, even though the right one is available.
>>
>> Cygwin uses wsock32.dll.
>
>That's not quite correct. Cygwin uses ws2_32.dll if available.
>The reason is the Winsock2 functionality used for duplicating
>sockets. The old method is still implemented as a fallback, though.
How is that implemented? I don't see it in the code. Where is
that implemented below?
Also the two tests for ws32_handle and wsock32_handle look reversed.
cgf
LoadDLLinitfunc (wsock32)
{
extern void wsock_init ();
HANDLE h;
if ((h = LoadLibrary ("wsock32.dll")) != NULL)
wsock32_handle = h;
else if (!wsock32_handle)
api_fatal ("could not load wsock32.dll. Is TCP/IP installed?");
else
return 0; /* Already done by another thread? */
if (!ws2_32_handle) /* IS THIS CORRECT? */
wsock_init ();
return 0;
}
LoadDLLinitfunc (ws2_32)
{
extern void wsock_init ();
HANDLE h;
if ((h = LoadLibrary ("ws2_32.dll")) == NULL)
return 0; /* Already done or not available. */
ws2_32_handle = h;
if (!wsock32_handle) /* IS THIS CORRECT? */
wsock_init ();
return 0;
}
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -