Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:17:59 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pilot-link and cygwin
Message-ID:	<20010406221759.A14994@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010406212530 DOT B26407 AT monster DOT master-link DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010406212530.B26407@monster.master-link.org>; from linguist-pilot@rich-paul.net on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:25:30PM -0400

On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:25:30PM -0400, linguist-pilot AT rich-paul DOT net wrote:
>Just wanted to let you guys know that there appears to be an alternate
>way to build pilot-link for windblows ... if you're forced to use
>windblows :(
>
>cygwin B1? seems to compile it just find, if you do the following:

No idea what Cygwin B1?  might be.  This sounds like you're advocating
using three or four year old software.  That can't be very useful.

I don't think that advice that people use really old software is
generally a good idea.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -