Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3ACA4BAB.9030705@wanadoo.fr>
Date:	Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:16:11 +0200
From:	"bruno patin (travail)" <bruno DOT patin AT wanadoo DOT fr>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0
X-Accept-Language:	fr-fr, fr-FR
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"J. J. Farrell" <jjf AT bcs DOT org DOT uk>
CC:	groupe cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: port of omniorb
References:	<200104030912 DOT f339CEo16900 AT capella DOT ssd DOT hal DOT com>

Hi,

I agree with you I think there is a bug. My question was not on what the 
definition of X_OK is but why it is as indicated by robert collins.

As a matter of fact, to end with mico, I only made the modification 
indicated in my other mail and the compilation posed no other problem. 
So I return to omniORB.


J. J. Farrell wrote:

>> From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
>> 
>>> From: bruno patin (travail) [mailto:bruno DOT patin AT wanadoo DOT fr]
>>> 
>>> as a matter of fact, I'll speak of Mico. There is at least 
>>> one problem 
>>> with the porting. In the file mico/include/mico/os-misc.h, 
>>> there is in 
>>> an enumerate an initialisation with the value X_OK. But the file 
>>> unistd.h (in sys) define this value as : define X_OK 
>>> _cygwin_X_OK and it 
>>> is not an integer so you have an error at the compilation of 
>>> the file in 
>>> mico that include os-misc.h. I replace X_OK directly by the 
>>> value of one 
>>> (not a great feat and subject to other error I know). But what is the 
>>> meaning of this define of X_OK in cygwin ?
>> 
>> It's exported from libcygwin.a
>> (look in unistd.h - you should see
>> extern const unsigned _cygwin_X_OK;)
> 
> 
> That looks like an implementation bug - X_OK is supposed to be
> defined as a constant in <unistd.h>.
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> 
> 
> 


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -