Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<3.0.6.32.20010331120804.00880dd0@pove.com>
X-Sender:	artsr AT pove DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date:	Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:08:04 -0500
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Art Povelones <art AT pove DOT com>
Subject:	Re: -mno-cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<20010330133443.A29516@redhat.com>
References:	<3AC4C0C3 DOT 6C3DD7F9 AT yahoo DOT com>
	<044601c0b929$91291400$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20010330110640 DOT B12883 AT redhat DOT com>
	<3AC4C0C3 DOT 6C3DD7F9 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 01:34 PM 3/30/01 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:22:11PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>As you said it's YO and MO is that -mcygwin, -mcrtdll and -mmsvcrt makes
>>even more sense.
>
>Except what's a "msvcrt" or a "crtdll"?  They're just strings of characters.
>
>Expecting people to know about these DLLs or any package name other than
>cygwin or (maybe) unix seems like it would still be subject to confusion.

This newbie's strong "vote" or urging would be for -mcygwin, -mcrtdll and
-mmsvcrt.  It just makes more sense to me and this way I immediately know
what I don't know.  I'm also less intimidated by sets of things than
inverse sets.

Art Povelones

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -