Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.0.0.25.0.20010330093251.00a66a30@barbar.esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
X-Sender:	uwe AT barbar DOT esat DOT kuleuven DOT ac DOT be
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:37:31 +0200
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	"Mumit Khan" <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
From:	Uwe Pahner <uwe DOT pahner AT esat DOT kuleuven DOT ac DOT be>
Subject:	Re: fscanf does not return EOF
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<01f201c0b8d5$6e9c5d60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
References:	<Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010329222253 DOT 29265D-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Thanks Mumit and Rob! The explicit test to EOF does the trick.

I replaced the direct call of the fscanf function in my code with the 
following:

int readline(FILE *inputfile,char *linetxt)
{
   int k;

   k=fscanf(inputfile," %[^\r]",linetxt);
   if ((k==0)&&(feof(inputfile)!=0))  k=EOF;
   return(k);
}

This seems to work fine.

Uwe
At 02:53 PM 3/30/01 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mumit Khan" <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
>To: "Uwe Pahner" <uwe DOT pahner AT esat DOT kuleuven DOT ac DOT be>
>Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:31 PM
>Subject: Re: fscanf does not return EOF
>
>
> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Uwe Pahner wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
> > I suggest portable coding, where you read the lines one by one using
> > fgets, checking for EOF, and if not, pass the line buffer it to
>sscanf.
> > Or, use fscanf, but check explicitly for eof on the stream when you
> > see a return value of 0.
> >
> > I may of course be reading the specification wrong.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mumit
> >
>
>I think you're right: I am using fscanf in my fifo tests, and the first
>iteration was written without checking the specs:].. as soon as I ran
>man 3 fscanf on my opsnBSD machine (best man pages ever) I saw the same
>point of confusion. Coding to the spec worked fine on cygwin.
>
>Rob




--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -